The Canon 6150B100 PowerShot A4000 IS 16MP Compact Digital Camera, in red, boasts advanced capabilities... |
- The Canon 6150B100 PowerShot A4000 IS 16MP Compact Digital Camera, in red, boasts advanced capabilities...
- 75 Canon photography tips for taking control of your camera #Canon #canonphotography #canonusers #c...
- New Review for the Canon EOS 70D digital camera....
- Canon Ixus 150 Point And Shoot Digital Camera - Grey (16mp, 8x Optical #offer 89,00 GBP SAVE 15,23 %
- Canon EOS 5DS R Digital SLR with Low-Pass Filter Effect Cancellation (Body Only) I got my hands on ...
- Canon EOS 5DS R Digital SLR with Low-Pass Filter Effect Cancellation (Body Only) I got my hands on ...
- Canon EOS 5DS R Digital SLR with Low-Pass Filter Effect Cancellation (Body Only) I got my hands on ...
- Canon EOS 5DS R Digital SLR with Low-Pass Filter Effect Cancellation (Body Only) I got my hands on ...
| Posted: 29 Jul 2015 07:05 AM PDT The Canon 6150B100 PowerShot A4000 IS 16MP Compact Digital Camera, in red, boasts advanced capabilities and chic style that set it apart from the crowd. It is equipped with a powerful 8x Optical Zoom to get you close to the action fast, and a 28mm… This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| Posted: 28 Jul 2015 06:49 PM PDT 75 Canon photography tips for taking control of your camera #Canon #canonphotography #canonusers #canonphotographers #EOS +Digital Camera World http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2015/07/08/75-canon-photography-tips-for-taking-control-of-your-camera/#null This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| New Review for the Canon EOS 70D digital camera.... Posted: 28 Jul 2015 04:10 PM PDT New Review for the Canon EOS 70D digital camera.... This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| Canon Ixus 150 Point And Shoot Digital Camera - Grey (16mp, 8x Optical #offer 89,00 GBP SAVE 15,23 % Posted: 28 Jul 2015 10:32 PM PDT Canon Ixus 150 Point And Shoot Digital Camera - Grey (16mp, 8x Optical #offer 89,00 GBP SAVE 15,23 % This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| Posted: 29 Jul 2015 02:14 AM PDT Canon EOS 5DS R Digital SLR with Low-Pass Filter Effect Cancellation (Body Only) I got my hands on both the 5DS and the 5DS R so I will be switching between the two when talking about my experience with the cameras. Both the 5DS and the 5DS R is nearly identical to the 5D Mark 3. The only noticeable difference is the mode dial which is a bit more coarser. The main selling point of this camera is the new 50 megapixel CMOS sensor. Although Canon and Sony has had higher resolution cameras over the last few years, Canon has finally released the big guns with the 5DS (R). This is something completely different for Canon who usually keeps the resolution in the low 20s. The camera produces such high quality images that it slows down my computer when loading the images. To compare, I have never had that problem with my 5D Mark 3. I tested both the 5DS and 5DS R with three lenses: the Canon 300 f/2.8, the Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 and the Zeiss 21mm f/2.8. I chose these three lenses because it represented a wide variety of situations a photographer may be in. Canon 300 f/2.8 (telephoto) This is one of my favorite lenses that I use a lot in wildlife including when I go to the zoo. For the purpose of testing, I kept the settings the same on my 5D M 3, 5DS and 5DS R. When comparing the resolution between the Mark 3 and the 5DS(R), I noticed a lot more detail when zooming into the picture. The resolution increased about 30% from the 5D 3 to the 5DS and on top of that the 5DS R had a 10% increase over the 5DS. Those tests were at the center of the image (lens). As you go out the edges of the image you'll notice a decrease in quality which to me wasnt that big of a deal. Even with the decrease in quality there was a 20% increase from the 5D 3 to the 5Ds. Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 (standard usage) With the Zeiss 85mm Otus things are just a bit different. The improvement between the 5D III and the 5DS is about 20% in the center, slightly less off-axis. The 5DS R version adds about 5% more resolution compared to the 5DS. I was a bit surprised at the result and repeated it several times to confirm the numbers and it was so. The reason I was surprised is the Otus is the highest resolving lens, and my first thought was it therefore would benefit the most from the higher resolution cameras. Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 (wide angle) Again, we see the resolution is greatly improved, with the 5DS MTF50 numbers about 30% higher than the 5D Mk III, even in the corners. Throughout most of the image, the 5DS R MTF50 numbers are about 10% higher than the 5DS. However, in the absolute corners there is only a small difference between the 5DS and 5DS R cameras. From other things we know about this lens, I would assume this is because the corner resolution with this lens is limited by astigmatism. I want to clarify this just a bit because depending upon how a tester is presenting data, you may see them present this corner data differently. Imatest doesn't measure astigmatism exactly, but does measure slanted lines that are nearly vertical and nearly horizontal. When I present corner data I average 8 numbers: the horizontal and vertical reading in each corner. Someone else may present only the best corner number, or the median corner number, or just vertical or horizontal numbers. This might have a corner number better or worse than what we are presenting. Summary For photographers who demand nothing but the highest resolution, you will love the newer 5DS and 5DS R. Landscape, bridal and studio photography are just some applications which I can see where the new models will shine with their 50-megapixel sensor. Based on the already competent 5D Mk III body, what you have is an amazing megapixel machine designed to delight every pixel peeper out there. The new 5DS and 5DS R shine brilliantly in a slow and deliberate photography workflow for which lighting level is not a concern. This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| Posted: 29 Jul 2015 02:09 AM PDT Canon EOS 5DS R Digital SLR with Low-Pass Filter Effect Cancellation (Body Only) I got my hands on both the 5DS and the 5DS R so I will be switching between the two when talking about my experience with the cameras. Both the 5DS and the 5DS R is nearly identical to the 5D Mark 3. The only noticeable difference is the mode dial which is a bit more coarser. The main selling point of this camera is the new 50 megapixel CMOS sensor. Although Canon and Sony has had higher resolution cameras over the last few years, Canon has finally released the big guns with the 5DS (R). This is something completely different for Canon who usually keeps the resolution in the low 20s. The camera produces such high quality images that it slows down my computer when loading the images. To compare, I have never had that problem with my 5D Mark 3. I tested both the 5DS and 5DS R with three lenses: the Canon 300 f/2.8, the Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 and the Zeiss 21mm f/2.8. I chose these three lenses because it represented a wide variety of situations a photographer may be in. Canon 300 f/2.8 (telephoto) This is one of my favorite lenses that I use a lot in wildlife including when I go to the zoo. For the purpose of testing, I kept the settings the same on my 5D M 3, 5DS and 5DS R. When comparing the resolution between the Mark 3 and the 5DS(R), I noticed a lot more detail when zooming into the picture. The resolution increased about 30% from the 5D 3 to the 5DS and on top of that the 5DS R had a 10% increase over the 5DS. Those tests were at the center of the image (lens). As you go out the edges of the image you'll notice a decrease in quality which to me wasnt that big of a deal. Even with the decrease in quality there was a 20% increase from the 5D 3 to the 5Ds. Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 (standard usage) With the Zeiss 85mm Otus things are just a bit different. The improvement between the 5D III and the 5DS is about 20% in the center, slightly less off-axis. The 5DS R version adds about 5% more resolution compared to the 5DS. I was a bit surprised at the result and repeated it several times to confirm the numbers and it was so. The reason I was surprised is the Otus is the highest resolving lens, and my first thought was it therefore would benefit the most from the higher resolution cameras. Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 (wide angle) Again, we see the resolution is greatly improved, with the 5DS MTF50 numbers about 30% higher than the 5D Mk III, even in the corners. Throughout most of the image, the 5DS R MTF50 numbers are about 10% higher than the 5DS. However, in the absolute corners there is only a small difference between the 5DS and 5DS R cameras. From other things we know about this lens, I would assume this is because the corner resolution with this lens is limited by astigmatism. I want to clarify this just a bit because depending upon how a tester is presenting data, you may see them present this corner data differently. Imatest doesn't measure astigmatism exactly, but does measure slanted lines that are nearly vertical and nearly horizontal. When I present corner data I average 8 numbers: the horizontal and vertical reading in each corner. Someone else may present only the best corner number, or the median corner number, or just vertical or horizontal numbers. This might have a corner number better or worse than what we are presenting. Summary For photographers who demand nothing but the highest resolution, you will love the newer 5DS and 5DS R. Landscape, bridal and studio photography are just some applications which I can see where the new models will shine with their 50-megapixel sensor. Based on the already competent 5D Mk III body, what you have is an amazing megapixel machine designed to delight every pixel peeper out there. The new 5DS and 5DS R shine brilliantly in a slow and deliberate photography workflow for which lighting level is not a concern. This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| Posted: 29 Jul 2015 02:12 AM PDT Canon EOS 5DS R Digital SLR with Low-Pass Filter Effect Cancellation (Body Only) I got my hands on both the 5DS and the 5DS R so I will be switching between the two when talking about my experience with the cameras. Both the 5DS and the 5DS R is nearly identical to the 5D Mark 3. The only noticeable difference is the mode dial which is a bit more coarser. The main selling point of this camera is the new 50 megapixel CMOS sensor. Although Canon and Sony has had higher resolution cameras over the last few years, Canon has finally released the big guns with the 5DS (R). This is something completely different for Canon who usually keeps the resolution in the low 20s. The camera produces such high quality images that it slows down my computer when loading the images. To compare, I have never had that problem with my 5D Mark 3. I tested both the 5DS and 5DS R with three lenses: the Canon 300 f/2.8, the Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 and the Zeiss 21mm f/2.8. I chose these three lenses because it represented a wide variety of situations a photographer may be in. Canon 300 f/2.8 (telephoto) This is one of my favorite lenses that I use a lot in wildlife including when I go to the zoo. For the purpose of testing, I kept the settings the same on my 5D M 3, 5DS and 5DS R. When comparing the resolution between the Mark 3 and the 5DS(R), I noticed a lot more detail when zooming into the picture. The resolution increased about 30% from the 5D 3 to the 5DS and on top of that the 5DS R had a 10% increase over the 5DS. Those tests were at the center of the image (lens). As you go out the edges of the image you'll notice a decrease in quality which to me wasnt that big of a deal. Even with the decrease in quality there was a 20% increase from the 5D 3 to the 5Ds. Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 (standard usage) With the Zeiss 85mm Otus things are just a bit different. The improvement between the 5D III and the 5DS is about 20% in the center, slightly less off-axis. The 5DS R version adds about 5% more resolution compared to the 5DS. I was a bit surprised at the result and repeated it several times to confirm the numbers and it was so. The reason I was surprised is the Otus is the highest resolving lens, and my first thought was it therefore would benefit the most from the higher resolution cameras. Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 (wide angle) Again, we see the resolution is greatly improved, with the 5DS MTF50 numbers about 30% higher than the 5D Mk III, even in the corners. Throughout most of the image, the 5DS R MTF50 numbers are about 10% higher than the 5DS. However, in the absolute corners there is only a small difference between the 5DS and 5DS R cameras. From other things we know about this lens, I would assume this is because the corner resolution with this lens is limited by astigmatism. I want to clarify this just a bit because depending upon how a tester is presenting data, you may see them present this corner data differently. Imatest doesn't measure astigmatism exactly, but does measure slanted lines that are nearly vertical and nearly horizontal. When I present corner data I average 8 numbers: the horizontal and vertical reading in each corner. Someone else may present only the best corner number, or the median corner number, or just vertical or horizontal numbers. This might have a corner number better or worse than what we are presenting. Summary For photographers who demand nothing but the highest resolution, you will love the newer 5DS and 5DS R. Landscape, bridal and studio photography are just some applications which I can see where the new models will shine with their 50-megapixel sensor. Based on the already competent 5D Mk III body, what you have is an amazing megapixel machine designed to delight every pixel peeper out there. The new 5DS and 5DS R shine brilliantly in a slow and deliberate photography workflow for which lighting level is not a concern. This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| Posted: 29 Jul 2015 01:51 AM PDT Canon EOS 5DS R Digital SLR with Low-Pass Filter Effect Cancellation (Body Only) I got my hands on both the 5DS and the 5DS R so I will be switching between the two when talking about my experience with the cameras. Both the 5DS and the 5DS R is nearly identical to the 5D Mark 3. The only noticeable difference is the mode dial which is a bit more coarser. The main selling point of this camera is the new 50 megapixel CMOS sensor. Although Canon and Sony has had higher resolution cameras over the last few years, Canon has finally released the big guns with the 5DS (R). This is something completely different for Canon who usually keeps the resolution in the low 20s. The camera produces such high quality images that it slows down my computer when loading the images. To compare, I have never had that problem with my 5D Mark 3. I tested both the 5DS and 5DS R with three lenses: the Canon 300 f/2.8, the Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 and the Zeiss 21mm f/2.8. I chose these three lenses because it represented a wide variety of situations a photographer may be in. Canon 300 f/2.8 (telephoto) This is one of my favorite lenses that I use a lot in wildlife including when I go to the zoo. For the purpose of testing, I kept the settings the same on my 5D M 3, 5DS and 5DS R. When comparing the resolution between the Mark 3 and the 5DS(R), I noticed a lot more detail when zooming into the picture. The resolution increased about 30% from the 5D 3 to the 5DS and on top of that the 5DS R had a 10% increase over the 5DS. Those tests were at the center of the image (lens). As you go out the edges of the image you'll notice a decrease in quality which to me wasnt that big of a deal. Even with the decrease in quality there was a 20% increase from the 5D 3 to the 5Ds. Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 (standard usage) With the Zeiss 85mm Otus things are just a bit different. The improvement between the 5D III and the 5DS is about 20% in the center, slightly less off-axis. The 5DS R version adds about 5% more resolution compared to the 5DS. I was a bit surprised at the result and repeated it several times to confirm the numbers and it was so. The reason I was surprised is the Otus is the highest resolving lens, and my first thought was it therefore would benefit the most from the higher resolution cameras. Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 (wide angle) Again, we see the resolution is greatly improved, with the 5DS MTF50 numbers about 30% higher than the 5D Mk III, even in the corners. Throughout most of the image, the 5DS R MTF50 numbers are about 10% higher than the 5DS. However, in the absolute corners there is only a small difference between the 5DS and 5DS R cameras. From other things we know about this lens, I would assume this is because the corner resolution with this lens is limited by astigmatism. I want to clarify this just a bit because depending upon how a tester is presenting data, you may see them present this corner data differently. Imatest doesn't measure astigmatism exactly, but does measure slanted lines that are nearly vertical and nearly horizontal. When I present corner data I average 8 numbers: the horizontal and vertical reading in each corner. Someone else may present only the best corner number, or the median corner number, or just vertical or horizontal numbers. This might have a corner number better or worse than what we are presenting. Summary For photographers who demand nothing but the highest resolution, you will love the newer 5DS and 5DS R. Landscape, bridal and studio photography are just some applications which I can see where the new models will shine with their 50-megapixel sensor. Based on the already competent 5D Mk III body, what you have is an amazing megapixel machine designed to delight every pixel peeper out there. The new 5DS and 5DS R shine brilliantly in a slow and deliberate photography workflow for which lighting level is not a concern. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Queryfeed | Canon Digital Camera To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment